This PR Fixes#4920
So the problem is that when a next.js application is built on windows, the `pages-manifest.json` file is created with backslashes. If this built application is deployed to a linux hosting enviroment, the server will fail when trying to load the modules.
```
Error: Cannot find module '/user_code/next/server/bundles\pages\index.js
```
My simple solution is to modify the `pages-manifest.json` to always use linux separator (`/`), then also
modify `server/require.js` to, when requiring page, replace any separator (`\` or `/`) with current platform-specific file separator (`require('path').sep`).
The fix in `server/require.js` would be sufficient, but my opinion is that having some cross-platform consistency is nice.
This change was tested by bulding an application in windows and running it in linux and windows, aswell as building an application in linux and running it in linux and windows. The related tests was also run.
# Conflicts:
# test/integration/production/test/index.test.js
Fixes#3705Fixes#4656
- No longer automatically dedupe certain tags. Only the ones we know are *never* going to be duplicate like charSet, title etc.
- Fix `key=""` behavior, making sure that if a unique key is provided tags are deduped based on that.
For example:
```jsx
<meta property='fb:pages' content='one'>
<meta property='fb:pages' content='two'>
```
Would currently cause
```jsx
<meta property='fb:pages' content='two'>
```
### After this change:
```jsx
<meta property='fb:pages' content='one'>
<meta property='fb:pages' content='two'>
```
Then if you use next/head multiple times / want to be able to override:
```jsx
<meta property='fb:pages' content='one' key="not-unique-key">
<meta property='fb:pages' content='two' key="not-unique-key">
```
Would cause:
```jsx
<meta property='fb:pages' content='two'>
```
As `key` gets deduped correctly after this PR, similar to how React itself works.
- Replaces taskr-babel with taskr-typescript for the `next` package
- Makes sure Node 8+ is used, no unneeded transpilation
- Compile Next.js client side files through babel the same way pages are
- Compile Next.js client side files to esmodules, not commonjs, so that tree shaking works.
- Move error-debug.js out of next-server as it's only used/require in development
- Drop ansi-html as dependency from next-server
- Make next/link esmodule (for tree-shaking)
- Make next/router esmodule (for tree-shaking)
- add typescript compilation to next-server
- Remove last remains of Flow
- Move hoist-non-react-statics to next, out of next-server
- Move htmlescape to next, out of next-server
- Remove runtime-corejs2 from next-server
**What's this PR?**
Based on the feedback on [this PR](https://github.com/zeit/next.js/pull/5722) @timneutkens asked me to create a test for `ssr: true`
**What's it do?**
- adds a test for setting `ssr: true` - /basic
- adds a test for setting `ssr: true` - /production
* Add node_modules bundling under the —lambdas flag for next build
* Run minifier when lambdas mode is enabled
* Add lambdas option to next.config.js
* Add test for lambdas option
Takes advantage of caching between builds for Terser, also makes writing caches for babel-loader faster by disabling compression.
Results for zeit.co (350 pages):
Without cache:
[4:16:22 PM] Compiled server in 1m
[4:16:57 PM] Compiled client in 2m
✨ Done in 125.83s.
With cache:
[4:19:38 PM] Compiled client in 17s
[4:19:50 PM] Compiled server in 29s
✨ Done in 31.79s.
Note: these results are from my multi-core Macbook Pro 2017, exact specs:
MacBook Pro (13-inch, 2017, Four Thunderbolt 3 Ports)
- 3,3 GHz Intel Core i5
- 16 GB 2133 MHz LPDDR3
- Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 1536 MB
The `without cache` build runs uglify in parallel, so without cache is likely to take longer on environments where you have only 1 core available.
The `with cache` build however runs in a single thread, so the results should be similar.
* Update jest
* Let jest start chromedriver
This makes sure chromedriver always ends even if the test was canceled by the user.
* Properly close browser in production-config test
* Properly close browser in production/security test
* Properly close browser in export test
* Properly close browser in app-aspath test
* Remove taskr from project root
This isn’t needed anymore
* Readd taskr to project root (temporary)
* Improve global setup/teardown
* Properly close browser in basic/client-navigation test
Clicking an target=_blank link will open a second browser window. We can only close this by using broser.quit()
* Set a default path for wasm modules
* Added the mimetype "application/wasm" for wasm files
* Upgrade write-file-webpack-plugin to 4.4.1
* Made dynamic(import()) in test to dynamic(() => import())
* Add failing tests
* Upgrade wd module
* Pass dynamic import webpack ids to the client side
* Pass through webpack ids to initalializer and only use those
* Compile dynamic(import()) to dynamic(() => import())
* Default dynamicIds
* Use forked hard-source-plugin
* Possibly fix test
* Make tests fail less intermittently
* Temporarily disable hard-source in production
* Make sure dynamic import chunks are unique
* Disable hard-source
* Log html if error is thrown
* Fix test
Since we are now using webpacks `mode` flag we can get rid of:
* `webpack.optimize.ModuleConcatenationPlugin`
* `webpack.DefinePlugin` (`process.env.NODE_ENV`)
https://webpack.js.org/concepts/mode/
* Add test for /_next/development route
* Make sure useFileSystemPublicRoute: false only disables filesystem routing
* Bring back comment
* Add useFileSystemPublicRoutes tests
Currently, using `as` will cause the router to think the URL is not changing in the case where you're re-rendering the same page with a different route. This would most likely be an issue for custom servers
which are using shallow routing.
This should be an invisible change for non-custom-server users, since `as` is defaulted to `url` if not set.
This should resolve#3065.
Fixes#5038
The problem with `constructor` is that it doesn't have `context` yet when being called. It's also considered unsafe to add a side-effect on constructor except when server-rendering
~I am not sure if this is a valid fix yet, but I was going to let CI run the tests for me. I'll close and look into it if the build fails.~
Let me know if this will cause issues, but I don't think it should. The React docs recommends moving `componentWillMount` logic into the constructor
