As reported by @ranyitz the links in the documentation about ['What syntactic features are transpiled? How do I change them?'](https://github.com/zeit/next.js#faq) are broken.
I updated the links and the text to reflect the latest changes.
Closes#4974
Related eb74ff4bf9
Running the [with-jest](https://github.com/zeit/next.js/tree/canary/examples/with-jest) example results in the following error:
```log
FAIL __tests__/index.test.js
● Test suite failed to run
SecurityError: localStorage is not available for opaque origins
at Window.get localStorage [as localStorage] (node_modules/jsdom/lib/jsdom/browser/Window.js:257:15)
at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
Test Suites: 1 failed, 1 total
Tests: 0 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 0.943s
Ran all test suites.
error Command failed with exit code 1.
```
Upgrading the dependencies (jest) to the latest version helps!
[More info](https://github.com/jsdom/jsdom/issues/2304)
Related #4776
* Implement autodllplugin
* Add flow-typed for autodll-webpack-plugin
* Improve onClick tests
* Make third test pass
* Make sure DLL bundle is loaded without async
* Add nonce
* Fix windows DLL path
Following https://github.com/zeit/next.js/pull/4950
Fix https://github.com/zeit/next.js/issues/4716
I'm not sure to understand this part, though :
> Note: in order to programmatically change the route without triggering navigation and component-fetching, use `props.url.push` and `props.url.replace` within a component
Is there a difference between :
```jsx
export default () => <a onClick={() => Router.push('/about')}>About</a>
```
and
```jsx
export default withRouter(
() => <a onClick={() => props.router.push('/about')}>About</a>
)
```
?
* replace componentWillReceiveProps by componentDidUpdate
* replace props.url by withRouter HOC
* fix deprecated `props.url` in with-shallow-routing example
- [x] Add unit test
- [x] Allow to get the display name of a native component (e.g.: `div`) without throwing
- [ ] Remove displayName in production mode
Fixes#4691Fixes#4614
This PR gives path to https://github.com/zeit/next-plugins/pull/242
I did not add or remove `^` near dependency versions in package.json files. However, I don't exclude that some changes can be made given that rc is more stable than beta.
Changes:
* Split `Header` component trough `_document.js` and `_app.js`
* Attached Router events with a way described in the [documentation](https://github.com/zeit/next.js#router-events) (though in the documentation is says it should be `Router.events.on` while I managed to get it working only by `Router.router.events.on` and I had to place it inside `componentDidMount`)
`<Container>` does not receive any property. There is no way the *scrollToHash* logic can work right now. I believe it's a regression. It was working fine at some point. I'm sorry, I'm too lazy to add a test.
This fix was tested on Material-UI 👌.
This bug reproduction is the following:
As soon as you want to transition to a new page with a hash. The scroll doesn't change.
- start on pageA
- you scrollTop to 100
- you move to pageB#hash
- you stay at scrollTop 100, but #hash is at scrollTop 400.
* Throw error if getInitialProps is defined as as instance method
Omitting the static keyword happens pretty often. Therefore we should trigger a warning in devmode.
Closes: #4782
* Document getInitialProps error
* Add unit tests for loadGetInitialProps
## Issue
Running [examples/with-custom-babel-config](https://github.com/zeit/next.js/tree/canary/examples/with-custom-babel-config) will result in the following error message:
```
./pages/index.js
Module build failed (from /some_path/next.js/dist/build/webpack/loaders/next-babel-loader.js):
Error: [BABEL] /some_path/next.js/examples/with-custom-babel-config/pages/index.js:
As of v7.0.0-beta.55, we've removed Babel's Stage presets.
Please consider reading our blog post on this decision at
https://babeljs.io/blog/2018/07/27/removing-babels-stage-presets
for more details. TL;DR is that it's more beneficial in the
long run to explicitly add which proposals to use.
...
```
## Explanation
Babel removed Babel's Stage presets on July 27, 2018.
More info: https://babeljs.io/blog/2018/07/27/removing-babels-stage-presets
## Solution
I've updated the example so ist just uses the babel plugin it actually needs.
## Related
Closes: #4772
## Context
When upgrading to Next.js 6.1.1-canary.4 and using the `emit-file-loader` included in Next.js, the following error is thrown:
```bash
error in ./src/graveyard/pages/_app.scss
Module build failed (from ../node_modules/next/dist/build/webpack/loaders/emit-file-loader.js):
TypeError: Cannot read property 'context' of undefined
at Object.module.exports (~/project-root/node_modules/next/dist/build/webpack/load
ers/emit-file-loader.js:27:68)
@ ./src/pages/_app.js 35:0-53 156:17-26 157:13-22
@ multi ./pages/_app.js
```
`next.config.js` (shortened):
```js
module.exports = {
webpack: (config, { dev }) => {
config.module.rules.push({
test: /\.scss$/,
use: [
{
loader: 'emit-file-loader',
options: {
name: 'dist/[path][name].[ext].js'
}
},
{
loader: 'babel-loader',
options: {
babelrc: false,
extends: path.resolve(__dirname, './src/.babelrc')
}
},
'styled-jsx-css-loader',
{ loader: 'postcss-loader', options: { sourceMap: dev } },
{
loader: 'sass-loader',
options: {
sourceMap: dev
}
}
]
});
return config;
}
};
```
## Suggested Fix
A quick Google search brought me to a [related issue in `webpack-loader`](https://github.com/webpack-contrib/worker-loader/issues/125). As pointed out in the [Webpack docs](https://webpack.js.org/api/loaders/#this-rootcontext):
> Starting with webpack 4, the formerly `this.options.context` is provided as `this.rootContext`.
This PR makes this change while maintaining backward compatibility.
## System information
Next.js: 6.1.1-canary.4
Node: v9.3.0
Changes:
- Use css prop on the element to style it
- Add webpack + babelrc configuration to remove otherwise needed import boilerplate [according to glamor docs](https://github.com/threepointone/glamor/blob/master/docs/createElement.md)
Rationale: The killer feature of glamor that makes it so great is that it relieves you from naming classes/styles if you use the custom css prop. Together with the babel plugin you also don't need any extra import wherever the css prop is used.
All the real world uses I've seen of glamor has used the css props so I think the example should reflect this. As an example here is docs how to use glamor with gatsby (using the css prop):
https://www.gatsbyjs.org/docs/glamor/
Changes:
* moved the configuration from HOC to `_app.js`
* fixed the example, as `componentDidCatch` catches errors during rendering phase, but not within event handlers.
Depends on https://github.com/zeit/next-plugins/pull/228
Failing tests are expected as `@zeit/next-css` has to be updated/released first.
This implements rendering of `.css` chunks. Effectively removing the custom document requirement when adding next-css/sass/less/stylus.