- Replaces taskr-babel with taskr-typescript for the `next` package
- Makes sure Node 8+ is used, no unneeded transpilation
- Compile Next.js client side files through babel the same way pages are
- Compile Next.js client side files to esmodules, not commonjs, so that tree shaking works.
- Move error-debug.js out of next-server as it's only used/require in development
- Drop ansi-html as dependency from next-server
- Make next/link esmodule (for tree-shaking)
- Make next/router esmodule (for tree-shaking)
- add typescript compilation to next-server
- Remove last remains of Flow
- Move hoist-non-react-statics to next, out of next-server
- Move htmlescape to next, out of next-server
- Remove runtime-corejs2 from next-server
* Remove flow-typed
* Remove flow types
* Remove the last types
* Bring back taskr dependency
* Revert "Bring back taskr dependency"
This reverts commit 38cb95d7274d63fe63c6ac3c95ca358a28c17895.
* Bring back preset-flow as it’s used for tests
* Revert "Revert "Bring back taskr dependency""
This reverts commit b4c933ef133f4039f544fb10bf31d5c95d3b27a2.
Extracting the logic that defines if a page is blocked to utils.
If that refactor make sense, I will create a next PR to cover both of the functions inside utils with tests.
* Add node_modules bundling under the —lambdas flag for next build
* Run minifier when lambdas mode is enabled
* Add lambdas option to next.config.js
* Add test for lambdas option
Takes advantage of caching between builds for Terser, also makes writing caches for babel-loader faster by disabling compression.
Results for zeit.co (350 pages):
Without cache:
[4:16:22 PM] Compiled server in 1m
[4:16:57 PM] Compiled client in 2m
✨ Done in 125.83s.
With cache:
[4:19:38 PM] Compiled client in 17s
[4:19:50 PM] Compiled server in 29s
✨ Done in 31.79s.
Note: these results are from my multi-core Macbook Pro 2017, exact specs:
MacBook Pro (13-inch, 2017, Four Thunderbolt 3 Ports)
- 3,3 GHz Intel Core i5
- 16 GB 2133 MHz LPDDR3
- Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 1536 MB
The `without cache` build runs uglify in parallel, so without cache is likely to take longer on environments where you have only 1 core available.
The `with cache` build however runs in a single thread, so the results should be similar.
