diff --git a/Readme.md b/Readme.md
index f72febca..0c010704 100644
--- a/Readme.md
+++ b/Readme.md
@@ -193,12 +193,165 @@ Note: we recommend putting `.next` in `.npmignore` or `.gitigore`. Otherwise, us
## FAQ
-The following tasks are planned and part of our roadmap
+
+ Is this production ready?
+ Next.js has been powering `https://zeit.co` since its inception.
+
+ We’re ecstatic about both the developer experience and end-user performance, so we decided to share it with the community.
+
-- [ ] Add option to supply a `req`, `res` handling function for custom routing
-- [ ] Add option to extend or replace custom babel configuration
-- [ ] Add option to extend or replace custom webpack configuration
-- [ ] Investigate pluggable component-oriented rendering backends (Inferno, Preact, etc)
+
+ How big is it?
+
+The client side next bundle, which includes React and Glamor is **${X}kb** gzipped.
+
+The Next runtime (lazy loading, routing, ``) contributes **${Y}%** to the size of that bundle.
+
+The codebase is ~1500LOC (excluding CLI programs).
+
+
+
+
+ Is this like `create-react-app`?
+
+Yes and No.
+
+Yes in that both make your life easier.
+
+No in that it enforces a _structure_ so that we can do more advanced things like:
+ - Server side rendering
+ - Automatic code splitting
+
+In addition, Next.js provides two built-in features that are critical for every single website:
+ - Routing with lazy component loading: `` (by importing `next/link`)
+ - A way for components to alter ``: `` (by importing `next/head`)
+
+Next is not suitable right now for creating reusable components that every single React app can use. But we consider that a feature, since your re-usable components should live in separate repositories and then `import`ed.
+
+In the future, we might consider a `next export` feature that produces a re-usable build of a component, to take advantage of Glamor and our simple and easy-to-use build system.
+
+
+
+
+ Why CSS-in-JS?
+
+`next/css` is powered by [Glamor](https://github.com/threepointone/glamor). While it exposes a JavaScript API, it produces regular CSS and therefore important features like `:hover`, animations, media queries all work.
+
+There’s *no tradeoff* in power. Instead, we gain the power of simpler composition and usage of JavaScript expressions.
+
+*Compiling* regular CSS files would be counter-productive to some of our goals. Some of these are listed below.
+
+In the future, however, we _might_ be able to take advantage of custom elements / shadow DOM to also support the full CSS syntax once browser support is wide enough.
+
+
+### Compilation performance
+
+Parsing, prefixing, modularizing and hot-code-reloading CSS can be avoided by just using JavaScript.
+
+This results in better compilation performance and less memory usage, specially for large projects. No `cssom`, `postcss`, `cssnext` or transformation plugins.
+
+It also means fewer dependencies and fewer things for Next to do. Everything is Just JavaScript® (since JSX is completely optional)
+
+### Lifecycle performance
+
+Since every class name is invoked with the `css()` helper, Next.js can intelligently add or remove `