gitlab-com-seaweedfs/seaweedfs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git synced 2024-01-19 02:48:24 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Updated Independent Benchmarks (markdown)

Chris Lu 2020-11-21 19:42:49 -08:00
parent fd2985b1d9
commit f7fb395154
1 changed files with 4 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
Independent-Benchmarks.md

@ -8,4 +8,7 @@ https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs/issues/370
I've decided to compare MooseFS performance to SeaweedFS in regards to small files.
I've copied all 30 million small files to SeaweedFS and then measured time taken by rsync to copy small files to empty 100GB SSD. It took 874 minutes (14h 34m) to fill the SSD with small files from MooseFS while it took 356 minutes (3h 56m) to fill the SSD from SeaweedFS.
SeaweedFS accomplished the task roughly 2.5 times faster than MooseFS but there is a catch: I've placed small files to SSD-backed chunkservers while SeaweedFS had the data on rotational HDDs. That's a serious evidence of efficient design when one can demonstrate 2+ times better performance on HDD versus SSD, isn't it?
SeaweedFS accomplished the task roughly 2.5 times faster than MooseFS but there is a catch: I've placed small files to SSD-backed chunkservers while SeaweedFS had the data on rotational HDDs. That's a serious evidence of efficient design when one can demonstrate 2+ times better performance on HDD versus SSD, isn't it?
# A SeaweedFS introduction in Chinese
https://github.com/bingoohuang/blog/issues/57