From 1b7885fe2cf2ccc4aef4b2558aa52be92d103899 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Backlund Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 09:26:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] The wording "even for small clusters" does not make sense when reading the rest of the sentence, I'm guessing that it is supposed to refer to larger clusters. --- Production-Setup.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Production-Setup.md b/Production-Setup.md index f05fe15..1787b1f 100644 --- a/Production-Setup.md +++ b/Production-Setup.md @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ weed server -filer -s3 -ip=xx.xx.xx.xx -volume.max=0 -master.volumeSizeLimitMB=1 If there are 2 machines, it is not possible to achieve consensus. Just do not bother to setup multiple masters. -Even for small clusters, it is totally fine to have one single master. The load on master is very light. It is unlikely to go down. You can always just restart it since it only has soft states collected from volume servers. +Even for large clusters, it is totally fine to have one single master. The load on master is very light. It is unlikely to go down. You can always just restart it since it only has soft states collected from volume servers. ### Setup masters